[Llvm-bgq-discuss] Patches for r176829-20130309 (the current vesta version)

[Prentice Bisbal]

It's definitely possible. I have some experience building RPMs, but 
can't volunteer my services for the following reasons:

1. I Only have a BG/P.
2. I'm a bit overloaded at the moment.
3. I've been having trouble getting LLVM/Clang to build for normally, 
without making an RPM. This hasn't been a high priority for me, so I 
haven't been asking for assistance here yet.

Prentice Bisbal
Manager of Information Technology
Rutgers Discovery Informatics Institute (RDI2)
Rutgers University
http://rdi2.rutgers.edu

On 03/29/2013 08:51 PM, Jeff Hammond wrote:
> i, who knows nothing about making RPMs, wonder if it is possible to
> distribute RPMs so that non-ALCF sites can more easily install LLVM.
>
> best,
>
> jeff
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I've attached the patches for the currently-installed version on vesta (r176829-20130309). These apply to upstream revision r176829. This is the first released version to contain QPX autovectorization for single-precision values (in addition to many other improvements). I've also included the bgclang wrapper script and the libc++ build script (and the llvm build script and the exception_ptr.h wrapper header).
>>
>> Another user-visible change to mention: You no longer need to explicitly include the qpxintrin.h header to use the IBM-style QPX intrinsics. This header is now automatically included for you.
>>
>> For any of you doing first-time on-your-own installs (or anyone else), please feel free to ask questions about how all of this needs to be setup in practice.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Hal
>>
>> --
>> Hal Finkel
>> Postdoctoral Appointee
>> Leadership Computing Facility
>> Argonne National Laboratory
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-bgq-discuss mailing list
>> llvm-bgq-discuss at lists.alcf.anl.gov
>> https://lists.alcf.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bgq-discuss
>>
>
>