[Llvm-bgq-discuss] linker errors with llvm/current/bin/bgclang++

[Hal Finkel]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> To: "Geoffrey Irving" <irving at naml.us>
> Cc: llvm-bgq-discuss at lists.alcf.anl.gov
> Sent: Saturday, February 2, 2013 8:45:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [Llvm-bgq-discuss] linker errors with llvm/current/bin/bgclang++
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Geoffrey Irving" <irving at naml.us>
> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> > Cc: llvm-bgq-discuss at lists.alcf.anl.gov
> > Sent: Saturday, February 2, 2013 4:09:56 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Llvm-bgq-discuss] linker errors with
> > llvm/current/bin/bgclang++
> > 
> > Alas, using the new clang I get a new compiler error.  Output and
> > preprocessed source here:
> 
> Well, that's not good. I have some idea of where the problem lies,
> and I'll fix it (or translate it into something that can be an
> upstream bug report). Thanks for testing!

As it turned out, this was not an upstream bug (meaning it was completely my fault). I think that particular bug is now fixed. Can you please try the build in /home/projects/llvm/r174287-20130202 to confirm.

Thanks again,
Hal

> 
>  -Hal
> 
> > 
> >     http://naml.us/random/clang/dominated
> >     http://naml.us/random/clang/dominated/output
> > 
> > Let me know if you want minimization or other assistance.  For now
> > I'll go back to the previous version.  I think my compute node
> > issues
> > may indeed be due to pulling in a bad libc, and I'm working on
> > cleaning up my dependencies now.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Geoffrey
> > 
> > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> > > Geoffrey,
> > >
> > > I've installed the rebased build in
> > > /home/projects/llvm/r174210-20130201; I've not yet switched it to
> > > the current default (so you'd need to set MPICH_CC and/or
> > > MPICH_CXX to use it with the mpi wrapper scripts) because I'm
> > > investigating some performance regressions. Nevertheless, I'd
> > > like
> > > to know whether or not this fixes your other problems.
> > >
> > > Also, hopefully you won't need -mcmodel=small with this build; if
> > > you still need it then please let me know that as well.
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > > Hal
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Geoffrey Irving" <irving at naml.us>
> > >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> > >> Cc: llvm-bgq-discuss at lists.alcf.anl.gov
> > >> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:33:57 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: [Llvm-bgq-discuss] linker errors with
> > >> llvm/current/bin/bgclang++
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >> From: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> > >> >> To: "Geoffrey Irving" <irving at naml.us>
> > >> >> Cc: llvm-bgq-discuss at lists.alcf.anl.gov
> > >> >> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:52:42 AM
> > >> >> Subject: Re: [Llvm-bgq-discuss] linker errors with
> > >> >> llvm/current/bin/bgclang++
> > >> >>
> > >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >> > From: "Geoffrey Irving" <irving at naml.us>
> > >> >> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> > >> >> > Cc: llvm-bgq-discuss at lists.alcf.anl.gov
> > >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:52:07 PM
> > >> >> > Subject: Re: [Llvm-bgq-discuss] linker errors with
> > >> >> > llvm/current/bin/bgclang++
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I'm still seeing this error.  If you've already rebased,
> > >> >> > should
> > >> >> > I
> > >> >> > file
> > >> >> > a bug upstream?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I've not yet rebased. I hope to get to that today.
> > >> >
> > >> > There was a bunch of prep work I had to do prior to rebasing,
> > >> > and I
> > >> > think that's now done. I'll start rebasing tomorrow, and I
> > >> > hope
> > >> > that it will be done by Tuesday. I'll send out a general
> > >> > e-mail
> > >> > when the new version is ready for testing.
> > >>
> > >> No worries about the delay: I have a workaround for the compiler
> > >> crash bug:
> > >>
> > >>     https://github.com/girving/pentago/commit/551a78502f323a3941219339036da10403d1c72a
> > >>
> > >> The problem is the following overload mixing variadic with
> > >> nonvariadic
> > >> templates:
> > >>
> > >>     https://github.com/otherlab/core/blob/da0965dee8e6c03f66d5a3e54ec5b0a7f3f302ee/vector/Vector.h#L526
> > >>
> > >> I only used this in a few places in my pentago code, so it was
> > >> easy
> > >> enough to call the constructor directly.
> > >>
> > >> Geoffrey
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > llvm-bgq-discuss mailing list
> > > llvm-bgq-discuss at lists.alcf.anl.gov
> > > https://lists.alcf.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bgq-discuss
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-bgq-discuss mailing list
> llvm-bgq-discuss at lists.alcf.anl.gov
> https://lists.alcf.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bgq-discuss
>