[Llvm-bgq-discuss] linker errors with llvm/current/bin/bgclang++

[Geoffrey Irving]

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Geoffrey Irving <irving at naml.us> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
>>> To: "Geoffrey Irving" <irving at naml.us>
>>> Cc: llvm-bgq-discuss at lists.alcf.anl.gov
>>> Sent: Saturday, February 2, 2013 8:45:31 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Llvm-bgq-discuss] linker errors with llvm/current/bin/bgclang++
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: "Geoffrey Irving" <irving at naml.us>
>>> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
>>> > Cc: llvm-bgq-discuss at lists.alcf.anl.gov
>>> > Sent: Saturday, February 2, 2013 4:09:56 PM
>>> > Subject: Re: [Llvm-bgq-discuss] linker errors with
>>> > llvm/current/bin/bgclang++
>>> >
>>> > Alas, using the new clang I get a new compiler error.  Output and
>>> > preprocessed source here:
>>>
>>> Well, that's not good. I have some idea of where the problem lies,
>>> and I'll fix it (or translate it into something that can be an
>>> upstream bug report). Thanks for testing!
>>
>> As it turned out, this was not an upstream bug (meaning it was completely my fault). I think that particular bug is now fixed. Can you please try the build in /home/projects/llvm/r174287-20130202 to confirm.
>
> Cool.  I'll give it a try once vesta comes back from maintenance.
>
> Geoffrey

Confirmed: /home/projects/llvm/r174287-20130202/bin/clang++ works fine
for me now, at least on the login nodes.  Thanks!

Geoffrey