[Llvm-bgq-discuss] linker errors with llvm/current/bin/bgclang++

Geoffrey Irving irving at naml.us
Tue Feb 5 11:36:54 CST 2013


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>
> ----- Geoffrey Irving <irving at naml.us> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Geoffrey Irving <irving at naml.us> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>> From: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
>> >>> To: "Geoffrey Irving" <irving at naml.us>
>> >>> Cc: llvm-bgq-discuss at lists.alcf.anl.gov
>> >>> Sent: Saturday, February 2, 2013 8:45:31 PM
>> >>> Subject: Re: [Llvm-bgq-discuss] linker errors with llvm/current/bin/bgclang++
>> >>>
>> >>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>> > From: "Geoffrey Irving" <irving at naml.us>
>> >>> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
>> >>> > Cc: llvm-bgq-discuss at lists.alcf.anl.gov
>> >>> > Sent: Saturday, February 2, 2013 4:09:56 PM
>> >>> > Subject: Re: [Llvm-bgq-discuss] linker errors with
>> >>> > llvm/current/bin/bgclang++
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Alas, using the new clang I get a new compiler error. Output and
>> >>> > preprocessed source here:
>> >>>
>> >>> Well, that's not good. I have some idea of where the problem lies,
>> >>> and I'll fix it (or translate it into something that can be an
>> >>> upstream bug report). Thanks for testing!
>> >>
>> >> As it turned out, this was not an upstream bug (meaning it was completely my fault). I think that particular bug is now fixed. Can you please try the build in /home/projects/llvm/r174287-20130202 to confirm.
>> >
>> > Cool. I'll give it a try once vesta comes back from maintenance.
>> >
>> > Geoffrey
>>
>> Confirmed: /home/projects/llvm/r174287-20130202/bin/clang++ works fine
>> for me now, at least on the login nodes. Thanks!
>>
>
> Great. You might also try r174287-20130203 which has fixes for some of the aforementioned performance regressions I've been investigating.

That also works.  I've confirmed that it doesn't fix the __thread
issue though; I'll isolate that for you tonight.

Geoffrey


More information about the llvm-bgq-discuss mailing list