[dcmf] [PATCH 2/3] Use naive strided routines for af_ufs.

[Robert Latham]

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 01:09:45PM -0600, Robert Latham wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 01:02:26PM -0600, Bob Cernohous wrote:
> > Ok, but the problem I had was non-PVFS.  Your patch enables ad_ufs.  So 
> > someone *could* use ufs:filename on non-PVFS, whether we think that makes 
> > sense or not.  So I tried the romio testcase on GPFS and NFS using -fname 
> > ufs:test.   The noncontig tests failed with ADIOI_NOLOCK_WriteStrided. 
> > They worked with ADIOI_GEN_WriteStrided_naive.
> 
> I'll look into that.  Doesn't make sense to me.  Perhaps I've
> introduced some bugs.  Certainly 'correct' wins, but I'm pretty sure
> NOLOCK should work for everything. 

Hey you know what this is most likely?  It's probably 97586a12a13b1298
(which I just sent to the list).

==rob

-- 
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division    A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF
Argonne National Lab, IL USA                 B29D F333 664A 4280 315B